A child in the media II
Laura is Editor-in-Chief of a national news agency. A reform is underway requiring standard-determining tests at the end of each school year, with pupils grouped by level based on results. The change has sparked media debate. Journalist Kate aims to show the children’s perspective and visits a disadvantaged area. With a father's permission, she interviews his 3rd-grade son. When asked if he knows what a national standardised assessment is, the child says “Yes.” Asked what he should be able to do for the test, he replies, “I must be quiet.” Kate asks Laura whether the clip should be aired.
What would you do in Laura's place?
- 1. The public needs the truth. The interview authentically reflects a child’s understanding of the standard-determining tests, and the parent gave their permission.
- 2. Standard-determining tests is where children should be heard, and the reformers should be reminded whose interests the reform is being made.
- 3. The response given by the child attracts attention, which is important in any case.
- 4. I suggest the journalist to only use the first part of the interview as child welfare organisations and media ethicists are unlikely to like the public dissemination of such an interview.
- 5. The child’s response may show him as stupid in the eyes of many viewers. I will not allow the journalist to use this interview.